Glantz v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Lancaster county: Lincoln Fuost, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBaknes, J.
Action for damages for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act of the defendant. Plaintiff had the verdict and judgment, and the defendant has appealed.
It appears that the plaintiff’s intestate, Philip Feuerstein, was, on the 22d day of December, 190(1, and theretofore had been, employed by the defendant as a sectionman, and was working on that section of the defendant’s railroad track extending from Lincoln to Havelock; that while repairing one of defendant’s switch tracks, at or near Havelock, on that day, he was run over and killed by one of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Little Rock & M. R. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. BaxterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Evans Laundry Co. v. CrawfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Malm v. ThelinNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. ShalstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Tsiampras v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Glantz v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- Zitnik v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1914
- Ahrens v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.