Legal Opinion

Malm v. Thelin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1896No. 6109PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

The defendant in error brought this action against the plaintiff in error to recover on account of injuries sustained by defendant in error in operating machinery while in the employ of the plaintiff in error, a laundryman. She recovered judgment for $2,500. For convenience the parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendant as their positions were in the district court. The petition, after alleging that the defendant was the' owner of and operated a laundry in Omaha, and that the plaintiff was his servant in the operation thereof, alleged that there was in the laundry a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SandfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Sioux City & Pacific Railroad v. FinlaysonNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Gran v. HoustonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bogenschutz v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Union Stock-Yards Co. v. GoodwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Elie v. C. Cowles & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
  3. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. ShalstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. WrightNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Olson v. Nebraska Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API