Legal Opinion

Hay v. Woosley

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This is a petition brought under Section 6892(b) of the Code seeking an increase in the compensation which had been allowed petitioner in a former proceeding in which he had been awarded a judgment for permanent partial disability of a leg to the extent of 30 per cent thereof.

The defendants filed a special plea of res adjudicata to the petition coupled with an answer. The case was heard by the Circuit Judge upon these pleadings and a written stipulation reading as follows:

“It is stipulated by and between Counsel in open Court that the defendant partnership paid into the hands of the Clerk of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hartford Hosiery Mills v. JerniganTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Phillips v. Memphis Furniture Mfg. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Shockley v. Morristown Produce & Ice Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Crane Enamelware Co. v. DotsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reams v. Trostel Mechanical Industries, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Nelson v. Cambria Coal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  3. American Snuff Co. v. HelmsTennessee Supreme Court · 1957
  4. General Shale Products Corp. v. Reese ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. Leaver v. Rudy Sausage Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API