Legal Opinion

General Shale Products Corp. v. Reese ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided April 26, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This action was filed under the provisions of Code Section 6865 in the names of Neal Reese and C. E. Litton, d/b/a the Litton Concrete Works, for the use and benefit of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, against the General Shale Products Corporation, to recover certain compensation benefits paid under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company to Neal Reese, an employee of the Litton Concrete Works. The Litton Concrete Works will hereinafter be referred to as “Litton”, the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company as “Guaranty Company ”, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Spivey v. St. Thomas HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  2. Odom v. Sanford & TreadwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Carman v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Revell v. McCaughanTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Gulf Refining Co. v. Huffman WeakleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bond Bros. v. SpenceTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. ElamTennessee Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API