Legal Opinion

Crane Enamelware Co. v. Dotson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

On September 19, 1925, Dotson recovered a judgment against the Crane Enamelware Company in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, under the 'Workmen’s Compensation Act, for six dollars per week for a period of three hundred weeks. Upon appeal the judgment of the trial court was affirmed by this court in an opinion published in 152 Tenn., 461., On September 13, 1928, the Crane Enamelware Company filed a petition in the Circuit Court against D'otson seeking to have the matter of compensation readjudicated under authority of. section 38 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

The petitioner insists…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goetz v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hartford Hosiery Mills v. JerniganTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fowler v. W. G. Const. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Huggins v. B. C. Jarrell & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Hay v. WoosleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. General Shale Products Corp. v. Reese ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1951
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. LongTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API