Legal Opinion

Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. Wilsfn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1928No. 6146PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HatcheR, Judge :

This is an action broughth by a Wholesale merchant against its. traveling salesman to recover of him advances, in excess of earned commissions. The contract between the parties stated a schedule of commissions the salesman was to receive, and then provided: “It is understood and agreed that you are to pay all expenses. We agree to advance weekly expense account, which amounts are to be charged against earned commissions. We agree to pay a drawing account of $200.00 per month, payable semi-monthly, which is to be charged against your earned commissions.” The 'employment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North-Western Mutual Life Insurance v. MooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Holmes v. BybeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. AnaconeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  4. Snellenburg Clothing Co. v. LevittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Roofing Sales Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ravetto v. Triton Thalassic Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Skweres v. Diamond Craft Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Grace v. MoralesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Tannen v. Equitable Life Ins. Co. of Washington, DCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Hibbs-Kiefer Hat Company v. SchneiderhanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API