In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground, Within the Sage Creek Drainage Area
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy
We determine in these cases consolidated for appeal that there is no right of appeal granted to a water right claimant under the state water rights adjudication process [Sections 85-2-201, -243, MCA], except from a final decree entered under Section 85-2-234, MCA; that the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure are included in the rules that govern the practice of the Water Courts [Rule 1.11(2), Water Claims Examination Rules]; that Rule 54(b) of the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure provides for and allows a water right claimant to seek and procure from the Water Court an express direction for the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Roy v. NeibauerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- McDonald v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- Parrot Ditch v. AshcraftMontana Supreme Court · 2024
- Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.