Legal Opinion

In Re the Adjudication of the Existing Rights to the Use of All the Water, Both Surface & Underground, Within the Sage Creek Drainage Area

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1988No. 88-092PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

We determine in these cases consolidated for appeal that there is no right of appeal granted to a water right claimant under the state water rights adjudication process [Sections 85-2-201, -243, MCA], except from a final decree entered under Section 85-2-234, MCA; that the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure are included in the rules that govern the practice of the Water Courts [Rule 1.11(2), Water Claims Examination Rules]; that Rule 54(b) of the Montana Rules of Civil Procedure provides for and allows a water right claimant to seek and procure from the Water Court an express direction for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  4. Roy v. NeibauerMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  5. McDonald v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Parrot Ditch v. AshcraftMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Robinson v. First Wyoming Bank, NAMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API