Legal Opinion

Roy v. Neibauer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1980No. 79-056PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

Plaintiff appeals an order of the Cascade County District Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Walter Neibauer. The plaintiff’s action against the other defendant, John Carlson, is still pending. Because the order appealed from is not a final one, and the plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of certification specified in Rule 54(b), M.R.Civ.P., this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Because of the recurring problems this Court has faced with relation to piecemeal appeals, we are impelled to set forth the requirements which must be met for an appeal where the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Nicola Panichella v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, (Warner Brothers Pictures, Inc., a Corporation)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  3. Schwartz v. Compagnie General TransatlantiqueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  4. Arlinghaus v. RitenourCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. United Bank of Pueblo v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. United Bank of Denver, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Roy v. NeibauerMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mallin v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ring v. HoseltonMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Weinstein v. UNIVERSITY OF MONTANAMontana Supreme Court · 1995

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API