Vanderburg v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
A jury found appellant guilty of criminal trespass, and the judge assessed punishment at 30 days in jail.
In his first point of error, appellant claims the evidence was insufficient. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we must determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Villalon v. State, 791 S.W.2d 130, 132-33 (Tex.Crim.App.1990).
A hall runs behind Harris County Criminal Court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Villalon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Boozer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Lection v. Dyll, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
- State v. Bartee, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Vanderburg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.