Legal Opinion

Vanderburg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1994No. 218-93PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON THE STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was convicted by a jury of criminal trespass and the trial court sentenced him to thirty days confinement in the county jail. The Court of Appeals reversed the conviction and rendered a judgment of acquittal. Vanderburg v. State, 843 S.W.2d 286 (Tex.App.1992). The State filed a petition for discretionary review alleging that the Court of Appeals erred in holding proof of a greater right of possession in the complainant is not sufficient to support a conviction for criminal trespass.

The facts of this case are almost identical to…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Vanderburg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Bader v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. State v. Bartee, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
  4. Sparkman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1997
  5. Cedrick Lamar Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API