Arnold v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
867 S.W.2d 378 (1993)
Peter Andrew ARNOLD, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
No. 689-93.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.
December 15, 1993.
Peter Andrew Arnold, pro se.
John B. Holmes, Jr., Dist. Atty., Timothy G. Taft and Chuck Rosenthal, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
Before the court en banc.
OPINION ON STATE'S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of criminal trespass. Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 30.05. The Court of Appeals found the evidence insufficient, reversed the judgment of the trial court and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Palmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- State v. KinseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Langston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.