Legal Opinion
Semerzakis v. Commissioner of Social Services
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 7, 2005No. SC 17180; SC 17181PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in these appeals is whether the orthodontics regulation, § 17-134d-35 (e) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies,1 is *4a reasonable utilization control over the provision of orthodontic treatment to individuals receiving medicaid early prevention, screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1396d (r). 2 The plaintiff, Elizabeth Semerzakis, brought an adminis*5trative appeal pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA), General Statutes § 4-166 et seq., from the decision of the defendant, the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Walsh, Acting Commissioner, Maine Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- S.D. Ex Rel. Dickson v. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Persico v. MaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. FloydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bontrager v. Indiana Family & Social Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Greco v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Housatonic Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Christopher R. v. Commissioner of Mental RetardationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.