Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Y. W. C. A.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1938No. 26777PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The well-settled rule in Ohio is that a hospital which is a charitable institution is not liable for injuries resulting from negligence of its servants unless it is shown that it failed to use due care in the selection or retention of the servants who caused the injury. Taylor, Admr., v. ProtestantHospital Assn., 85 Ohio St. 90, 96 N.E. 1089; Taylor v.Flower Deaconess Home and Hospital, 104 Ohio St. 61,135 N.E. 287, 23 A. L. R., 900; Rudy v. Lakeside Hospital, 115 Ohio St. 539, 155 N.E. 126; Lakeside Hospital v. Kovar, Admr., 131 Ohio St. 333, 2 N.E.2d 857.

While many different theories are…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ould v. Washington Hospital for FoundlingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hordern v. . Salvation ArmyNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Basabo v. the Salvation Army, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  4. Little v. City of NewburyportMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Philadelphia v. Women's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Andrews v. Y.M.C.A.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. Andrews v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Cullen v. SchmitOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Moore v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API