Legal Opinion

Cullen v. Schmit

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1942No. 28611PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The sole problem now requiring the attention of this court is the substantive question whether the trial court was in error in arresting the evidence from the consideration of the jury and rendering judgment in favor of the defendants.

It was the view of the trial court that the record discloses evidence tending to show negligence on the part of the defendants in failing to light the church stairway properly and in providing a handrail on one side only. However, it was held further that the defendants are not liable for this negligence inasmuch as the church they maintain is a charitable or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waddell v. Y. W. C. A.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Rudy v. Lakeside HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Sisters of Charity v. DuveliusOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lakeside Hospital v. KovarOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. President & Directors of Georgetown College v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. Muller v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re Bond Hill-Roselawn Hebrew SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Rosen v. Concordia Evangelical Lutheran Church, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1960
  5. Williams v. First United Church of ChristOhio Court of Appeals · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API