Legal Opinion

Bradish v. Lucken

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The plaintiff, who is a resident, freeholder, and tax-payer of the town of Fisher but outside of the village of Fisher, brought this action in the district court for Polk county, to restrain the defendants, who are the county treasurer, clerk of the district court, and sheriff, from collecting or attempting to collect certain personal taxes.

Read the full summary

The plaintiff, who is a resident, freeholder, and tax-payer of the town of Fisher but outside of the village of Fisher, brought this action in the district court for Polk county, to restrain the defendants, who are the county treasurer, clerk of the district court, and sheriff, from collecting or attempting to collect certain personal taxes. The complaint, after setting out the organization of the town of Fisher, the incorporation and reincorporation of the village of Fisher as recited in the opinion, alleges that prior to 18S6 the town of Fisher became indebted in the sum of $10,000, for…

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

This appeal is from an order overruling the demurrer to the complaint. The complaint shows that the township of Fisher, in the county of Polk, was organized under the general township organization laws on the 9th day of October, 1876. By Sp. Laws. 1881, c. 15, certain sections and parts of sections in the same congressional township, as therein described, were constituted ,a village corporation under the name of Fisher. It was also provided ■in the charter that the village should remain a part of the town of Fisher, or Fisher’s Landing, as it was called, and that the entire •township,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Oblinger v. SpaudeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fairley v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Wall v. BorgenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Laird, Norton Co. v. County of PineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  4. Rumsey v. Sauk Centre TownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Great Northern Bridge Co. v. Town of FinlaysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API