Fairley v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to restrain defendants from enforcing certain ordinances of defendant city. From an order, Cant, J., overruling their demurrer to the complaint and granting a temporary injunction, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendants appeal from an order overruling their demurrer to the complaint and from an. order granting a temporary injunction.
The complaint asked an injunction against the enforcement of an ordinance of Duluth imposing a wheelage tax on motor vehicles. The trial court held that the wheelage tax was valid to an amount not exceeding 20 per cent of the 2 per cent value tax imposed by the state on motor vehicles by the statute of 1921. An order was entered forbidding the enforcement of the wheelage tax in excess of the amount stated and overruling the demurrer..
Section 3 of article 16 of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Tribette v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
- City of Chicago v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Roanoke Guano Co. v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- McIntyre v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- State v. Karmil Merchandising Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
- Raymond v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- American Railway Express Co. v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.