Legal Opinion

Wall v. Borgen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1922No. 22,739PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

On September 30, 1921, plaintiff, a resident and taxpayer of St. Louis county, brought this action in behalf of himself and of all other persons in the county similarly situated to enjoin defendant, the county auditor of the county, from levying or extending the tax directed to be levied by chapter 357, p. 537, uf the Laws of 1921, on the ground that this statute is unconstitutional and void.

This statute requires the county auditor in every county having an assessed valuation exceeding $250,000,000 exclusive of moneys and credits, and an area exceeding 5,000 square miles, to levy…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  2. Fairley v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Golcher v. BrisbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  4. Newman v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of SebekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Adelman v. OnischukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Rosso v. Village of Brooklyn CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Fichtner v. SchillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Braddock Iron Mining Co. v. ErskineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API