Legal Opinion

Mark v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1932No. Docket No. 530PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The appeal herein is taken by the plaintiff from a judgment denying to her the relief which she sought by the institution of the action. Plaintiff’s complaint, which was filed November 23, 1927, alleged that at all times therein mentioned she was the wife of defendant William Mark; .that on April 25, 1923, defendant Title Guarantee & Trust Company, being the record owner of the legal title to lot 69 of tract 5780 in the city of Los Angeles, California, entered into a contract with William Mark whereby said owner agreed to sell to William Mark and the latter agreed to buy the above-described…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Stafford v. MartinoniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. McKay v. LauristonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Pabst v. ShearerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Lahaney v. LahaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Lezine v. Security Pacific Financial Services Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Vierra v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gantner v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Dietlin v. Missouri State Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API