Legal Opinion

Dietlin v. Missouri State Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1932No. Docket No. 8371PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPENCE,

J.—Plaintiff brought two actions seeking to recover on three insurance policies issued by the defendant company. One of these actions (superior court No. 212,-855) involved an accident insurance policy and the other (superior court No. 217,765) was based upon two life insurance policies. The actions were consolidated and tried by the court sitting without a jury. Separate judgments were entered in favor of plaintiff, from which judgments defendant appeals upon a bill of exceptions.

Both actions involved the rights of plaintiff under the disability clauses of the policies and we will…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  2. Mark v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Wm. R. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. Rowe & CarithersMississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bagnall v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Austero v. National Casualty Co. of DetroitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Dietlin v. General American Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wheeler v. OppenheimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API