Tongret v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NUGENT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (Docket # 20). For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued with this Order, the Motion for Summary Judgement is hereby GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff began his service as a trainman with NW in 1964. For most of Plaintiffs’ career with NW, he worked in NW’s Cleveland, Ohio yard. During his employment with NW, Plaintiff was a member of, and was represented by, The United Transportation Union, which had a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Clarence Erwin Copeland v. Mark MacHulis James StephensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Higgins v. Metro-North RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by Administrator, Personal Representative, Kera Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025
- Estate of Phillip Raymond Morgan, by Administrator, Personal Representative, Kera Morgan v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Delaware corporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025