Legal Opinion

Pearsons v. Washington College

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 5 opinions

PROM WASHINGTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Washington County. — Hal. H. Haynes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chide Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The bill in the present case was filed by H. P.’Pear-sons, administrator of the well-known philanthropist, Dr. D. K. Pearsons, to rescind, on the ground of fraud, *603a gift of $25,000' made by Dr. Pearsons to tbe defendant.

Tbe bill alleges, in substance, that Dr. Pearsons, .about July 4, 1906, made tbe donation above mentioned; that before it was made be imposed tbe con■dition that there should be $75,000 bona fide subscriptions to tbe endowment fund of tbe college; that Dr. J. T. Cooter, president of tbe college, acting for it,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Kennedy v. BenderTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Richardson v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. A. Landreth Co. v. SchevenelTennessee Supreme Court · 1899

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  2. Samuel v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Continental Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MemphisDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1958
  4. Hudson v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1937
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API