Wilbur v. Flood
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. Circuit. This was au action of replevin to recover the possession of certain chattels which Flood had exchanged with Wilbur for lands, he, Wilbur, had failed to convey. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. The case was removed by writ of error and bill of exceptions. - The facts and rulings of the Court below are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.
An action of replevin was brought by Flood against Wilbur to recover certain chattels which Flood had exchanged with Wilbur for lands which the latter had failed to convey, having substituted a different description. The facts as claimed were in substance these. In exchange for the horses, wagon and harness, which are the subjects of this suit, Wilbur was to deed a clear title to the northeast ten acres of a certain forty acre lot which he said he owned. About the beginning of June, 1864, Wilbur gave Flood a *43deed of an undivided fourth, of the forty acres, instead of the specified…
2Cited by90 opinions
- Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. RennoMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.