Legal Opinion
People v. Glaze
California Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1980No. Crim. 21123PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
Under the California Constitution, may a city pass an ordinance which requires only picture arcades to close between the hours *844of 2 a.m. and 9 a.m. in order to prevent the possibility of masturbation by any of their customers?
I
Appellant Glaze was charged in March 1978 with a violation of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 103.101, subdivision (g),1 which provides that “[e]ach picture arcade must remain closed between the hours of 2:00 A.M. and 9:00 A.M., and all customers, patrons, and visitors must be excluded therefrom between those hours. Where only one coin operated…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- L.A. All. for Survival v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.