Legal Opinion
Gluck v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 17, 1979No. Civ. 54193PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
In Carl v. City of Los Angeles (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 265 [132 Cal.Rptr. 365] the Court of Appeal held a Los Angeles City “news rack” ordinance invalid because its broad provisions violated First Amendment guarantees and intruded upon a state-preempted area of regulation of the distribution of “harmful matter” to minors. The Carl court left open the possibility that a more narrowly drawn ordinance might be valid. (61 Cal.App.3d at pp. 275-276 and fn. 10.) The appeal at bar tests the validity of a Los Angeles County news rack ordinance narrowly drawn.
We conclude that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carroll v. President & Commissioners of Princess AnneSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- Palos Verdes Shores Mobile Estates, Ltd. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Sebago, Inc. v. City of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.