Legal Opinion

Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of Education

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 7, 1996PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

GARIBALDI, J.

Plaintiffs assert that the Vineland Board of Education (the Board), the City of Vineland (the City), the architect, Glenn A. Kahley (Kahley), and the general contractor, Art Anderson, Inc. (Art Anderson), are liable to them for damage to their crops and farmland from flooding that was caused by the improper siting and construction of a public school across the street from their property and by an inadequate drainage system on a bordering street. The school was constructed in 1979, but plaintiffs did not file suit until 1990.

At issue in…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Rosenberg v. Town of North BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  4. Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Town of Kearny v. BrandtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Daidone v. Buterick BulkheadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Hamer v. City of TrinidadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  5. Fluehr v. City of Cape MaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API