Legal Opinion

United States v. Leal

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 20, 1956No. 7582PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

George W. Latimer, Judge:

Following trial by general court-martial, the accused was found guilty of four offenses of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 715. He was sentenced to dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, and confinement for two years. Intermediate reviewing authorities have affirmed, but The Judge Advocate General of the Air Force suspended execution of the punitive discharge. We granted review to determine :

1. Whether the evidence is sufficient to corroborate the accused’s pretrial statement.

2, Whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. VillasenorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. United States v. IsenbergUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. EvansUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. ChaputUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. PettyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. ThorntonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. YoungUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. BuckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. PabonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API