Legal Opinion

H & F HOGS v. Huwe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1985No. Civ. 10838PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

H & F Hogs [H & F], a partnership, appeals from a district court judgment dismissing its foreclosure action against Kenneth and Betty Huwe. We affirm.

In 1970 the Huwes acquired a one-half interest in a lot in Bergen, North Dakota. The Huwes executed a promissory note to H & F requiring five payments of $11,000, and also executed a mortgage on their interest in the property to secure the note.

The Huwes defaulted on the note and abandoned the premises in 1972. Between 1972 and 1975, the property was rented to other parties. No real estate taxes were paid after 1975, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Kirkwood Plaza v. MuellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. First State Bank of Cooperstown v. IhringerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McKee v. KinevNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Loraas v. ConnollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Galloway v. Forum Publishing CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A. v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Production Credit Ass'n of Fargo v. FossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Gust v. Peoples and Enderlin State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Alerus Financial, N.A. v. Marcil Group Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API