Legal Opinion

Loraas v. Connolly

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1964No. 8058PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover a balance of $5,000.00 alleged to be due upon a $20,000.00 note. Defendants’ admitted the execution of the $20,000.00 note and of a real property mortgage to secure it, but alleged that the debt had been compromised for $15,000.00 and the mortgage satisfied. They also alleged that an action at law to recover part of a debt which had been secured by a real property mortgage violated statutes regulating procedure for actions to collect debts secured by real property mortgages.

A pretrial conference in the case was, in effect, converted to a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albert v. Edgewater Beach Building Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Wells v. United Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Business Service Collections Bureau v. YegenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Cooperstown v. IhringerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. H & F HOGS v. HuweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. McKee v. KinevNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ludvik v. James S. Jackson Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Gust v. Peoples and Enderlin State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API