Legal Opinion

Holman v. Christensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. 4650PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

The defendant prosecutes this appeal from a decree quieting title in plaintiffs to all of the Waters which arise from springs, seepage, and percolation upon plaintiffs’ lands. The plaintiff James I. Holman is the owner of 48.92 acres of land, and the plaintiff W. S. Christopherson is the owner of 21.69 acres. The lands of plaintiffs are adjacent. The Christopherson land is' north of the Holman land. Defendant is the owner of 40 acres of land lying immediately to the west of plaintiffs’ lands. A lane or road extends north and south between the lands owned by plaintiffs and the land owned by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Willow Creek Irrigation Co. v. MichaelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Geddis v. ParrishWashington Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Southern California Investment Co. v. WilshireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stanley v. StanleyUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Adams v. Portage Irrigation Reservoir & Power Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Dahlberg v. DahlbergUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Deseret Livestock Co. v. SharpUtah Supreme Court · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API