Geddis v. Parrish
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Kittitas Coionty. Action by George W. Parrish against S. R. Geddis to enjoin the obstruction of an irrigating ditch. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
AllyN, J.
Parrish, appellee, seeks to establish his title to an irrigating ditch having its flow from a spring upon the land of appellant, and across which it flows to the property and ditch of appellee (plaintiff). Appellant contends that the original flow from this spring was slight, and at times scarcely at all, and the flow, now large and valuable, is from the seepage of irrigation above; that the spring is not a flowing one; and also denies prior appropriation to appellant’s title. The evidence of a large number of witnesses, who testified to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Basey v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Atchison v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Barnes v. SabronNevada Supreme Court · 1875
- Ophir Silver Mining Co. v. CarpenterNevada Supreme Court · 1868
- Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- Benton v. JohncoxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Hindman v. RizorOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Lummi Indian Nation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.