Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Skutt Ceramic Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 29, 1987No. C9-87-991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellants Mary Ann and Brian Peterson appeal the judgment of the district court’s denial of their motion to vacate judgment pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 60.02. Appellants argue judgment should have been vacated because they have a meritorious claim, the reasons for delay were excusable, and the case was dismissed under an unconstitutional rule of the district court. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellants commenced this action seeking damages for injuries allegedly resulting from Mary Ann’s exposure to toxic substances while using ceramic kilns. The exposure is alleged to have taken place…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Finden v. KlaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Firoved v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Howard v. FrondellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Sand v. School Service Employees Union, Local 284Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Bentonize, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990