Legal Opinion

Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 9, 1990No. C6-89-1228Published

1Opinion of the Court

450 N.W.2d 137 (1990)

Brenda HOVELSON, Respondent,

v.

U.S. SWIM & FITNESS, INC., et al., Appellants.

No. C6-89-1228.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

January 9, 1990.

Review Denied March 16, 1990.

Donald E. Horton, Horton & Associates, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Richard L. Leighton, Carroll & Leighton, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellants.

Heard, considered and decided by WOZNIAK, C.J., and PARKER and CRIPPEN, JJ.

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Appellants Scandinavian U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc., an Ohio corporation (Scandinavian USSF), and U.S. Swim & Fitness Minnesota Inc., a Minnesota corporation (USSF Minnesota),…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. Lange v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API