Legal Opinion
Bullen v. Chaffinch
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 24, 2004No. Civ.A. 02-1315-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Post Trial Motion To Promote Them To The Rank Of Sergeant In The Delaware State Police And For Other Post Trial Relief (D.I. 123). By their Motion, Plaintiffs request the Court to (a) order Defendants to promote them to the rank of sergeant when the next available vacancies occur, (b) enjoin defendants from using racial quotas or racially suspect classification in their promotion process, and (c) appoint a federal monitor to review whether the use of racial quotas and racially suspedt classifications has been…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- John D. Starceski, at No. 94-3208 v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, at No. 94-3182Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Jaime Blum, Brij Kapur and James C. Spitsbergen, in 86-5349 v. Witco Chemical Corporation, in 86-5310Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Loretta E. Stana v. School District of the City of Pittsburgh and Charles N. AllebrandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Dean Patterson v. Stephen A. PortchCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Todaro v. County of UnionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- Hemphill v. City of WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011