Hemphill v. City of Wilmington
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TIMOTHY R. RICE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Lisa A. Hemphill seeks various forms of equitable relief in the wake of a jury’s finding that her employer, the City of Wilmington (“the City”), retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The City objects to each of Hemphill’s requests, arguing she is entitled to no relief at all, notwithstanding the jury verdict in her favor. Based on the remedial purpose underlying Title VII, I will grant Hemphill’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Beginning in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Louisiana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lily Spencer, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/crossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McFadden v. City of ColumbusDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023