Legal Opinion
Loretta E. Stana v. School District of the City of Pittsburgh and Charles N. Allebrand
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 22, 1985No. 85-3004PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
I
Appellant Loretta E. Stana brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982), alleging that the defendants, the School District of Pittsburgh and Charles N. Allebrand, Assistant Director of Personnel for the District, violated her constitutional rights to due process of law. We must decide whether the district court erred in granting summary judgment for defendants. See Stana v. School District of Pittsburgh, 598 F.Supp. 842 (W.D.Pa.1984).
The following facts are undisputed: Sta-na was certified to teach chemistry and general science by the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Baraka v. McGreeveyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- John D. Alvin v. Jon B. SuzukiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sample v. DiecksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.