Petersen v. City of Seattle
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
James, J. —
Petitioners were convicted in Seattle Municipal Court of 64 violations of Seattle's "panoram" ordinance.1 Their timely motion to dismiss the charges on the ground that the complaints failed to specify the place where the alleged offenses occurred was denied by the municipal court judge.2
*110After conviction, petitioners sought a writ of certiorari from superior court to review the denial of their motion to dismiss. The order for the writ was issued by a court commissioner and expressly provided that "[petitioners may file notice of appeal in said complaints without prejudice to their…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BringgoldWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- City of Seattle v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LaPierreWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Bitts, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Camas v. KigginsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- State v. Cascade District CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979