Hassay v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff's principal contention is that "having established a prima facie case of death by violent and accidental means, unrefuted by evidence showing death by any other cause, she was entitled to a directed verdict for the increased indemnity under the terms of the policy, or to judgment for the amount notwithstanding the verdict of the jury for the defendant."
In an action under a life insurance policy like the present one to recover an increased amount for death by accidental means, the weight of authority would appear to support the principles (1) that the burden rests upon the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Larimore v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1875
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Mitchell v. New York Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- American Casualty Company v. George W. TimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Wolfe v. Order of United Commercial TravelersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1945
- Bridge v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Carson v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.