Legal Opinion
Bridge v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 1944No. 29530PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Was there a final order in the Municipal Court of Cleveland?'
It is established in this court that where a motion to direct a verdict is overruled and, after a verdict is returned for plaintiff, the trial court grants defendant’s motion for a new trial and overrules his motion for a judgment in Ms favor, the overruling of the defendant’s motion for judgment is a final order from which defendant, feeling aggrieved, may appeal to the Court of Appeals. See Hocking Valley Mining Co. v. Hunter, 130 Ohio St., 333, 199 N. E., 184; and Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. Neuerman, 130 Ohio St., 334, 199…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States v. GratiotWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Hocking Valley Mining Co. v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Cincinnati Goodwill Industries v. NeuermanOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Mitchell v. New York Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Hassay v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Samuel R. Ferguson v. The Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Howard v. KuehnertOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Schick v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
- Mutual Life Ins. v. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- DiLoreto v. ShellenbergerOhio Court of Appeals · 1960