Legal Opinion
Wolff v. Tomahawk Manufacturing
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 28, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00880Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAMES B. WOLFF, Case No. 3:21-cv-880-SI Plaintiff, TENTATIVE OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. EXCLUDE PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT WITNESSES TOMAHAWK MANUFACTURING, Defendant. Stephen Healy, LAW OFFICE OF STEPHEN HEALY, 9450 SW Gemini Drive, PMB 79802, Beaverton, OR 97008, and Sean Darshan Healy, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN HEALY, 1390 N. McDowell Blvd., Suite G, Petaluma, CA 94952. Of Attorneys for Plaintiff James B. Wolff. David W. Silke and Eliza Whitworth, GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP, 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2100, Seattle,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Primiano v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.