Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Alford

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1900No. S.F. No. 1862PublishedCited by 19 opinions

MOTION to dismiss appeal from an order of the. Superior Court of Fresno County refusing to set aside a default and to fix time for the defendant 'to plead. E. W. Eisley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Judgment in the above action was entered against the defendant April 6, 1897, and on August 9, 1897, the court made an order vacating the judgment as to the respondent herein. An appeal from this order was dismissed April 9, 1898. Thereafter the plaintiff made a motion before the superior court' to set aside the default of the defendant Dollie E. Alford, and to fix a time for her to plead. Her motion was denied May 21, 1898, and the present appeal is from this order. The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable order, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Security Loan & Trust Co. v. Boston & South Riverside Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Brackett v. BanegasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Huffaker v. DeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. VivasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
  4. Martin v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. State Ex Rel. Hahn v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API