Legal Opinion
State v. Ames
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 19, 1907No. 6397PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Jefferson county, Hatch, J., entered March 23, 1906, upon sustaining a demurrer to an information charging the defendant with violation of the state pilotage laws.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On February 20, 1906, the prosecuting attorney of Jefferson county filed an information against the respondent accusing him of violating the pilotage laws of the *329state of Washington; the charging part of the information being as follows:
“The said Charles W. Ames, within one year preceding the filing of this information, in the state of Washington, in and upon the waters of the Straits of Juan de Fuea and Puget Sound, on her voyage inward and outward bound, under continuous contract for hire, the steamship ‘CraighalP did wrongfully and unlawfully pilot to Port Townsend, Washington, from Port…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Plumb v. ChristieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- State v. ShawOregon Supreme Court · 1892
- Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State v. BurgdoerferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Rosenbloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. NewcombWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- State v. HanlenWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State v. RheaumeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1922
- State v. MerchantWashington Supreme Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.