Field v. Holzman
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
— The appellants are members of many different mercantile firms having claims against George Holzman for goods sold him, and all united in one complaint against, the appellees.
'¡Che separate claims of the different firms are set forth in the complaint, and it is alleged that Max Feder is the father-in-law of Holzman, and that Louis Feder and Max Silver-burg are his brothers-in-law; that these persons entered into *206a conspiracy to defraud the creditors of Holzman, and, to effect this purpose, agreed that he should buy on credit a large quantity of goods, and take them into his store at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Carmichael v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Bennett v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- More v. MassiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Nave v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Feder v. FieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.