City of Fort Smith v. Carter
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Chief Justice.
Appellant, the City of Fort Smith, brings this appeal from the Crawford County Circuit Court’s award of attorney’s fees in an eminent domain action. The City argues that the circuit court misinterpreted and misapplied Rule 11 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure in awarding attorney’s fees. Appellees and cross-appellants, J.D. Carter, Mary Lois Carter, Lee. Hackler, and Patricia Hackler appeal the circuit court’s finding that Ark. Code Ann. § 18-15-605 (b) (Repl. 2003) does not entitle them to an award of attorney’s fees because the statute does not apply to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc. Michael ShippCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Richard's Honda YamahaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jackson v. Sparks Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Taffner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
- City of Fort Smith v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Tyson Poultry, Inc. v. NarvaizSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Muntaqim v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.