Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Carter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 10, 2008No. 07-220PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

The instant appeal arises out of a dispute as to whether a circuit court can award attorney’s fees to a mortgagee of condemned property taken by eminent domain, under Arkansas Code Annotated § 18-15-605 (b) (Repl. 2003). Two years ago, we heard a previous appeal of the same matter in City of Fort Smith v. Carter, 364 Ark. 100, 216 S.W.3d 594 (2005). Upon remand, the circuit court ordered the City of Fort Smith to pay attorney’s fees to J.D. and Mary Lois Carter, the owners in possession of the condemned property, and Lee and Patricia Hackler, the mortgagees of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. City of Fort Smith v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Moore v. TillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Bank of Oak Grove v. Wilmot State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  5. CJ Building Corp. v. TRAC-10Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Northland Casualty Co. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Mountain Pure, LLC v. Little Rock Wastewater UtilitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  4. FANEUIL INVESTORS GROUP, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. Board of Selectmen of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  5. Benca v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API