Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Forbes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

237 Or. 559 (1964)

385 P.2d 618

391 P.2d 748

ALDRICH ET UX

v.

FORBES ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued December 3, 1963.

Reargued March 30, 1964.

Reversed April 29, 1964.

Motion to strike renunciations sustained October 8, 1963.

Petition for rehearing denied May 26, 1964.

David P. Templeton and Dusenbery, Martin, Beatty & Parks, Portland, on the motion.

No appearance contra.

MOTION SUSTAINED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This cause is before us upon a motion made by the plaintiffs-respondents

"* * * for an order striking or declaring null and void the papers filed by Palma J. Whitney Guthrie and Viola W. Whitney on or…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stabile v. McCarthyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  3. Ogooshevitz v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Smith v. MathisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Schroeder v. WoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API