Legal Opinion
De Weese v. Unick
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 13, 1980No. Civ. 56842PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, Acting P. J.
On May 12, 1970, a child was born to Mellis Ann De Weese (hereinafter De Weese), who at that time was not married. A paternity suit was commenced by De Weese in the Santa Barbara Superior Court naming Timothy Alan Unick (hereinafter Unick) as the father. A blood test was taken by the parties in the early part of October 1974, the results of which did not exclude the possibility of Unick’s paternity. Through his attorney, Unick stipulated that he was in fact the natural father of the child and agreed to pay child support. Pursuant to that stipulation, the court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Citizens for Open Access to Sand and Tide, Inc. v. Seadrift Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Johnson v. American Airlines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Johnson v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Malkoskie v. Option One Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.