Legal Opinion

State v. Crabtree

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Defendant contends that the court erred, (1) in denying his motion for a discharge, and (2) in refusing to grant him a new trial.

Defendant, Jack Crabtree, age thirty-one, was employed as a barker for a carnival show, which show, in part, consisted of women “stripping” or posing in the nude. While the carnival was showing at Austin, Minnesota, where the prosecutrix, Elaine Bringe, lived, and while she was attending said carnival at Austin, defendant approached her and inquired whether she would like to work in the show. She replied that she would, but not in her home town where she was known.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. O'Boyle v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rice v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cleaveland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Hofer v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. FriesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. MedranoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. MedranoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API