Legal Opinion

State v. Fries

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1945PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Sec. 340.47, Stats., provides that “any person over eighteen years of age who shall unlawfully and carnally know and abuse any female under the age of eighteen years shall be punished by imprisonment.” There was no spoken testimony directly addressed to the matter of defendant’s age. The case was submitted to the jury solely on the question as to whether defendant had sexual intercourse with the prosecuting witness on August 2, 1944. The court in its instructions used the following language: “It appears without dispute that the defendant, Jake Fries, is over the age of eighteen.” The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EmmonsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Thornton v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Lanphere v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  4. State v. DorathySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  5. Hermann v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gauthier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. RicheyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Torres v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. LauritsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ZihlavskyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API