Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1900PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to review a judgment of the circuit court for Fond du Lac county: N. S. GilsoN, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of rape upon a child of the age of ten years.

1Opinion of the Court

Maeshaíl, J.

No detailed statement' of facts need be made in this case, or of the evidence relating thereto. It is deemed best to include in published records of such cases only so much of their history as is indispensable to an understanding of the points presented for adjudication and decided.

The first point made is that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence. The age of the girl and the opportunity for the accused to commit the offense were established beyond reasonable controversy. All the circumstances of the offense itself were positively testified to by the girl, and there is no…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Emery v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Buel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Dickerson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Fertig v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Odette v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brown v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Vogel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Duthey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Birmingham v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API