Legal Opinion

State v. Medrano

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1978No. 76-114-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*15BEILFUSS, C.J.

After a party at a farmhouse near Plymouth, Wisconsin on the evening of November 16-17, 1974, two of the guests, Diane Kenealy and Cynthia Miller, reported to authorities that they were forced to partake in numerous acts of sexual intercourse and sexual perversion. David Peter Medrano was charged with raping each of the women, and tried with five other defendants who were charged with raping or performing acts of sexual perversion with one or both of the women.

On this appeal Medrano contends the trial court erred in admitting hearsay testimony and evidence regarding a gun in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. ShearsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bailey v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. DiMaggioWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Holloway v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. LopezSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. WollmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. FenclWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. KollerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Haskins v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. PankowCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API